<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eye on Winer &#187; fame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/tag/fame/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyeonwiner.org</link>
	<description>Keeping an eye on Dave Winer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:50:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dave Winer&#8217;s Obsession with Twitter Continues</title>
		<link>http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/2009/dave-winers-obsession-with-twitter-continues</link>
		<comments>http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/2009/dave-winers-obsession-with-twitter-continues#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bullshit Mancuso</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dave winer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason calacanis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeonwiner.org/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice example of projection from Dave Winer on Twitter:

Twitter is a big deal now. Calacanis used to be #1, now he&#8217;s a nobody. For a guy like him the difference is huge. And the resentment real.
About 21 hours ago from web

Winer keeps going on and on and on about Twitter&#8217;s suggested users list, which gave [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice example of projection from Dave Winer on Twitter:</p>

<blockquote>Twitter is a big deal now. Calacanis used to be #1, now he&#8217;s a nobody. For a guy like him the difference is huge. And the resentment real.
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/davewiner/status/1938129078">About 21 hours ago from web</a></p></blockquote>

<p>Winer keeps going on and on and on about Twitter&#8217;s suggested users list, which gave some celebs and tech A-listers many hundreds of thousands of followers compared to his 20,000. But as he bitches and moans about how follower counts like his used to make you a big deal, he completely ignores the fact that most of the people who read him on Twitter have followers in the hundreds or lower. He was perfectly happy with the inequalities of the system while he was on top. Now he&#8217;s Che Fucking Guevara.</p>

<p>Show of hands: Does anyone else other than Winer give a shit about the suggested users list or Twitter follow counts? Thanks to Twitter, we have learned that a 50-something obscure software developer wakes up every single day and gets his Depends in a bunch because Ashton Kutcher and Oprah and P. Diddy have more followers than he does. It&#8217;s a sad but hilarious spectacle to watch him go ape over any system that quantifies popularity and puts him at the top &#8212; as long as he stays there &#8212; and go all jilted lover when he falls off it.</p>

<p>Earth to Dave: You are not famous. You are Internet famous, which only means anything when something is new. When the rest of the world shows up, as they have on Twitter, the genuinely famous show up and that&#8217;s the end of your celebrity. On Twitter now your Internet fame is worthless. Ashton Kutcher craps out bigger celebrities than you each morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/2009/dave-winers-obsession-with-twitter-continues/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
