<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eye on Winer &#187; XML-RPC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/tag/xml-rpc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyeonwiner.org</link>
	<description>Keeping an eye on Dave Winer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>XML-RPC is &#8220;Simple&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/2008/xml-rpc-is-simple</link>
		<comments>http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/2008/xml-rpc-is-simple#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EyeOnWiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML-RPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/2008/xml-rpc-is-simple</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many times, the things Dave writes on Scripting.com are bizarre. Usually, though, they&#8217;re just bizarre and neurotic opinions. Seldom does Dave say something so inherently, flatly, and factually incorrect as what he said today: Today&#8217;s XML-RPC is exactly as it was 10 years ago, which, if you were developing XML-RPC apps means that your apps [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many times, the things Dave writes on Scripting.com are bizarre. Usually, though, they&#8217;re just bizarre and neurotic <em>opinions</em>. Seldom does Dave say something so inherently, flatly, and factually incorrect as what he <a href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/04/more10yearAnniversaries.html">said today</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Today&#8217;s XML-RPC is exactly as it was 10 years ago, which, if you were developing XML-RPC apps
  means that your apps still work, and that&#8217;s a good thing. Nothing that&#8217;s come along before or since
  rivals XML-RPC for simplicity and utility.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>False. Just plain false. Dave believes that it&#8217;s true because he uses an ancient piece of software that does nothing but XML-RPC, but the &#8220;simple&#8221; fact of the matter is that, from the ground up, nothing is more simple than REST is. Take a look.</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s a sample XML-RPC request:</p>

<blockquote><pre>
&lt; ?xml version="1.0"?>
&lt;methodcall>
   &lt;methodname>examples.getStateName&lt;/methodname> 
      &lt;params> 
         &lt;param> &lt;value>&lt;i4>41&lt;/i4>&lt;/value> &lt;/param> 
      &lt;/params> 
&lt;/methodcall>
</pre></blockquote>

<p>There&#8217;s a lot of complexity there. Just take a look and try to imagine that you&#8217;ve never seen XML-RPC before. Now let&#8217;s take a look at REST.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>http://url.com/MethodName?param=value</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Oh, yeah, Dave. XML-RPC is sooo much simpler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eyeonwiner.org/archives/2008/xml-rpc-is-simple/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

